I have a recognition to make, I like the concept of defense. Like a defender lawyer, I represent people who are billed have a crime, be it traffic, dwi/driving in a state of drunkenness, minor violations or law. As reported by the explanation that I have been told by many people, I defended ‘world trash.’ Because deciding that is the part of my practice to become a lawyer, I have been told by my friends, family and total other people that the profession I choose is ‘wrong,’ ‘despicable,’ I have even learned the things that I do is “wrong with America. ” I tried to have a legal discussion using this visitor to explain my decision to practice defense. Sometimes, this discussion works well, other opportunities they do not do. Either in the situation, publishing articles that convey rational defenders’ lawyers may provide insight to individuals who are instead unaware, and clearly disagree, protect the defendant.

The political will of group tightening to apply new criminal law against victims of the Violence – Daily News

I know what I think about being a defender lawyer because I need criminal law and evidence at school. However, I do not know why this profession is important until I study constitutional law. This is the level of metabolism that supplies all the freedom we like today. Many people consider this freedom to be given, especially due to the fact that they are not confronted with a scenario where these legal rights will protect them. Nevertheless, these legal rights are still available when needed. These types of legal rights range from the fifth amendment to self-accusations and legal processes, the 4th amendment to the search and confiscation that makes no sense and also the sixth amendment for advisors.

Constitutional law rights determined for, and therefore are upheld, so that they can ensure that innocent people are not collected due to forced recognition, inadequate lawyers or inadequate legal processes. Apart from the fact that our bodies are imperfect, for reasons that innocent people are still charged, these constitutional law rights are the most useful balance in supplying protection to people who are accused but still time does not limit excessive efforts to Identifying, arresting and arresting and eventually demanding those who are criminal responsible.

A good thing about these laws and rights and how they are applied today is the fact that they are not only caused by brilliant thoughts in our ancestors who compile the level of metabolism, but they are applied because they are centuries of Caselaw precedents. This means, from the beginning they were, these legal rights happened to be debated in many trials where the decision was made about how they should be applied with certain details. This decision happened to be evaluated by a larger appeal court, such as the top court of U. S. This state means that the number of unimaginable legal scholars, from defending lawyers and prosecutors government prosecutors to idol judges through the court has combined efforts to create a determination exactly how they should be applied. Regardless of the fact that from time to time precedent was canceled when given a new detail, which should only provide greater security in understanding that, although not common, they can be canceled if the condition is changed because the precedent is set (for example, consider the way the internet has changed many laws -Laws and regulations in connection with copyright, lawyers, defamation, fifth amendments, harassment, etc.)

I mentioned these legal rights because they were exactly as protected by defending lawyers. In many of my discussions with people who have problems with defense, other parties usually fall into 1 of 2 groups: 1. They think a lot of legal rights received in our system and the criminal defendant must have less protection