The Federal Trade Commission issued a statement moment that restores the agency’s policy of strictly administering the civil ban on illegal styles of competition. Congress gave the FTC the unique authority to identify and police against these practices, beyond what the other antitrust bills cover. But in recent times the agency has not always carried out that responsibility constantly.

The FTC’s former policy confined its oversight to a narrower set of circumstances, making it harder for the agency to challenge the full array of anticompetitive gestein the request. moment’s statement removes this restriction and declares the agency’s intent to exercise its full statutory authority against companies that use illegal tactics to gain an advantage rather of contending on the graces.

When Congress created the FTC, it easily commanded us to crack down on illegal styles of competition, said FTC Chair LinaM. Khan. “ Enforcers have to use discretion, but that does n’t give us the right to ignore a central part of our accreditation. moment’s policy statement reactivates Section 5 and puts us on track to faithfully apply the law as Congress designed. ”

Congress passed the Federal Trade Commission Act in 1914 because it was unhappy with the enforcement of the Sherman Act, the original antitrust enactment. Section 5 of the FTC Act bans “ illegal styles of competition ” and instructs the Commission to apply that prohibition.

In 2015, still, the Commission issued a statement declaring that it would apply Section 5 using the Sherman Act “ rule of reason ” test, which asks whether a given restraint of trade is “ reasonable ” in profitable terms. The new statement replaces that policy and explains that limiting Section 5 to the rule of reason contradicted the textbook of the enactment and Congress’s clear desire for

it to go beyond the Sherman Act. And it shows how the Commission will police the boundary between fair and illegal competition through both enforcement and rulemaking. The statement makes clear that the agency is committed to guarding requests and keeping up with the evolving nature of anticompetitive geste

Illegal styles of competition, the policy statement explains, are tactics that seek to gain an advantage while avoiding contending on the graces, and that tend to reduce competition in the request. The Policy Statement lays out the Commission’s approach to policing them. It’s the result of numerous months of work across agency departments.

Staff delved the legislative history of Section 5 and its interpretation across hundreds of Commission opinions, concurrence orders, and court opinions including further than a dozen Supreme Court opinions. This rich case history will guide the agency as it implements Section 5. Through enforcement and rulemaking, the Commission will put businesses on notice about how to contend fairly and fairly. This is in discrepancy with the rule of reason, which requires judges to make delicate case- by- case profitable prognostications.

The Commission vote to authorize the Policy Statement was 3- 1, with Commissioner ChristineS. Wilson advancing no. president LinaM. Khan, joined by Officers RebeccaK. Slaughter and AlvaroM. Bedoya, issued a statement. Commissioner Bedoya, joined by Chair Khan and Commissioner Slaughter, issued a statement. Commissioner Wilson issued a differing statement.

The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and cover and educate consumers. You can learn further about how competition benefits consumers or file an antitrust complaint. For the rearmost news and coffers, follow the FTC on social media, subscribe to press releases and read our blog.